Comments on: 7 wishes for the new Geoprocessor http://michalisavraam.org/2010/02/7-wishes-for-the-new-geoprocessor/ a spatial web presence Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:39:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Thomas http://michalisavraam.org/2010/02/7-wishes-for-the-new-geoprocessor/comment-page-1/#comment-983 Thomas Mon, 10 May 2010 14:46:05 +0000 http://michalisavraam.org/?p=259#comment-983 I'm really crossing my fingers for multi-core functionality. I do a lot of simple raster analysis, and there's absolutely no reason for it to take as long as it does. I’m really crossing my fingers for multi-core functionality. I do a lot of simple raster analysis, and there’s absolutely no reason for it to take as long as it does.

]]> By: VictorVelarde http://michalisavraam.org/2010/02/7-wishes-for-the-new-geoprocessor/comment-page-1/#comment-839 VictorVelarde Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:15:34 +0000 http://michalisavraam.org/?p=259#comment-839 Adding wps compliant services could make arcgis server geoprocessing services available inside other desktop / web clients in a standard way, with a simple API, Mixed / concatenated with services from other providers... inside a SOA bus... After WMS and WFS I think it is inminent. Have a look at 52north initiative: http://52north.org/maven/project-sites/wps/52n-wps-site/ Adding wps compliant services could make arcgis server geoprocessing services available inside other desktop / web clients in a standard way, with a simple API, Mixed / concatenated with services from other providers… inside a SOA bus… After WMS and WFS I think it is inminent. Have a look at 52north initiative: http://52north.org/maven/project-sites/wps/52n-wps-site/

]]> By: Greg Corradini http://michalisavraam.org/2010/02/7-wishes-for-the-new-geoprocessor/comment-page-1/#comment-556 Greg Corradini Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:31:59 +0000 http://michalisavraam.org/?p=259#comment-556 All good points. Numbers 3, 4 and 7 are my most important votes. All good points. Numbers 3, 4 and 7 are my most important votes.

]]> By: Ben Reilly http://michalisavraam.org/2010/02/7-wishes-for-the-new-geoprocessor/comment-page-1/#comment-542 Ben Reilly Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:20:24 +0000 http://michalisavraam.org/?p=259#comment-542 Add utility network tools to the geoprocessor, so one does not have to instantiate a dozen ArcObjects in .NET or roll their own method of persisting the network topology to make an automated custom network trace. Add utility network tools to the geoprocessor, so one does not have to instantiate a dozen ArcObjects in .NET or roll their own method of persisting the network topology to make an automated custom network trace.

]]> By: Michalis Avraam http://michalisavraam.org/2010/02/7-wishes-for-the-new-geoprocessor/comment-page-1/#comment-533 Michalis Avraam Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:55:17 +0000 http://michalisavraam.org/?p=259#comment-533 Victor, I did not even touch on the server-side of things. You are quite right, this would be wonderful as an addition, even though I am not sure why ESRI would want to produce this. Care to give some clarification on why ESRI would want this, and how likely you think it is for them to provide it? Victor,

I did not even touch on the server-side of things. You are quite right, this would be wonderful as an addition, even though I am not sure why ESRI would want to produce this. Care to give some clarification on why ESRI would want this, and how likely you think it is for them to provide it?

]]> By: VictorVelarde http://michalisavraam.org/2010/02/7-wishes-for-the-new-geoprocessor/comment-page-1/#comment-532 VictorVelarde Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:56:23 +0000 http://michalisavraam.org/?p=259#comment-532 I would like ESRI to provide a WPS interface so that any ogc-wps client could consume server geoprocesses. I would like ESRI to provide a WPS interface so that any ogc-wps client could consume server geoprocesses.

]]>